Introduction
Historically, the Church
has used the word “regeneration” in two different ways: (1) as referring to
baptism and the incorporation into the Church, and (2) as conversion. The
former use is the dominant one in the early church, and the latter one the dominant
use in evangelicalism today and since the Reformation. The problem is that
Scripture teaches both ideas, using language that includes both (“regeneration”
and “born again”), so what terms do we use? The 1928 Book of Common Prayer
speaks of regeneration in baptism, but also uses potential language in that
baptismal office, indicating that there is something more that may follow. The
New Testament speaks of “regeneration” in baptism (Titus 3:5) and also of being
“born again” in John’s writings as conversion. How do we present these things
without confusing people? This paper is not an exhaustive study of these ideas,
but primarily a study of “regeneration” in Titus 3:5 (with some other passages)
and of “being born again” in John. The point is to demonstrate that both ideas
of regeneration are in the New Testament, and that we in the Reformed Episcopal
Church can hold to the Declaration of Principles and believe in “regeneration”
in baptism without denying the other aspect of “new birth/conversion.” Read the full paper (PDF)
Saturday, November 29, 2014
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment